您当前所在的位置:官网首页 > 新闻资讯 >

双语:面对美媒各种追问,这位华为外籍高管的回答很精彩!

  ag总代理雪儿送优惠2686103385华为美国首席网络安全官Andy Purdy:“华为可能是世界上被审查和评估的最多的公司之一,因此我们的任何缺陷都可以被识别和弥补。”

  美国一系列不友好政策的步步紧逼,但华为凭借自身技术的突破,以及其领导层展现出的宽宏胸襟和过人气魄,收获了多方的赞赏。

  戳链接回顾: 看了任正非专访视频,世界各地网友这么评价他;任正非:我们想朋友遍天下,我们不想做孤家寡人;华为董事陈黎芳在《纽约时报》发文:美国需要华为。

  前段时间,一位华为外籍高管——华为美国公司首席安全官Andy Purdy 通过一段与外媒的“舌战” 吸引了人们的目光。

在主持人和节目嘉宾刁钻的提问下,Purdy从容不迫、不卑不亢 的机智应答实在很过瘾。

  一起来围观一下当时的“战况”吧!

  以下英文部分via C-SPAN

  ROUND 1

  在请 Purdy 对自己担任的工作和华为公司作了简短介绍后,主持人问道:

  Who is the founder? And what is his background?

  (华为的)创始人是谁?他是啥背景?

  Purdy用最简单的话语介绍了任正非平凡起点下的非凡成就,还顺便把华为的企业精神 夸了一波:

  He was an engineer with the People's Liberation Army many years ago. He moved to form his own company with others with a few thousand dollars, and he has had spectacular growth. He has always incentivized people to innovate and the customer centric.

  他多年前是中国人民解放军的一名工程师。他用几千美元与他人共同成立了自己的公司,并取得了惊人的发展。他总是鼓励人们创新,并以客户为中心。

  The primary focus of Huawei is to be customer centric and not get every dollar of profit out of every contract, but to take a long view if our customers make money and their customers make money, we are all working well together for a common advantage.

  华为的首要焦点是以客户为中心,不是总想着要从每一份订单中获取每一分钱的利润,而是从长远来看,如果我们的客户赚钱,我们客户的客户也赚钱,我们便在为共同的利益而努力。

  接着主持人并不拐弯抹角,直接问道:

  Why is Huawei considered a threat to national security in the US?

  为什么华为被认为是美国国家安全的威胁?

  Purdy完全没有被对方的直接所影响,他用严谨的措辞和客观的视角分析这个问题:

  It is complicated, there is not a simple answer.

  这很复杂,没有一个简单的答案。

  The USis not safe in cyber space. The US looks at things from a risk perspective whether national security or other risks.

  美国在网络方面不总是安全的。无论是国家安全还是其他风险,美国都是从风险的角度来看待问题的。

  It is that kind of risk-based perspective that is affecting the perspective of the UStoward Huawei. It is more country focused than company focused.

  正是这种基于风险的视角,影响了美国对华为的看法。它更关注的是(中国)这个国家而不是公司。

  ROUND 2

  一轮过后,主持人搬出了“救兵”——《华尔街日报》负责电信和技术方面报道的记者Drew Fitzgerald。

  记者表示:

  I am curious, there have been rules proposed and enacted in theUS.That have essentially all but banned Huawei equipment in networks in theUS.What is the status of Huawei's business operations in America?

  我很好奇,美国已经提出并颁布了许多规定,基本上在美国禁止华为的网络设备。华为在美国的业务状况如何?

  对此Purdy表示,一方面,华为有着强大的团队和研发能力,另一方面,美国对华为安全性的排斥源于美国网络空间的不安全性。

  与此同时,他还强调了一些美国农村 地区离不开华为。戳链接补知识:美国网友快哭了:特朗普禁止华为,我们大农村快断网了!

  We have 1500 employees in the United States, a strong R&D presence. We purchased $11 billion in US components last year. Our enterprise and consumer business, we are maintaining our revenues at present.

  我们在美国拥有1500名员工,强大的研发力量。去年我们购买了价值110亿美元的美国零部件。在企业和消费者业务方面,我们目前保持着(稳定的)收入。

  The prohibitions in National Defense Authorization Act kick in an August 2019, and those are focused on government contracts which we are not pursuing, and government contractors.

  美国《国防授权法案》中的禁令将于2019年8月生效,禁令主要涉及政府合同和承包商,这些不是我们业务的重点。

  There may be a greater potential impact going forward. We believe in the end the United States will have the kinds of measures in cyberspace that will make us more secure. When we get to that point, we think we will be allowed to compete on a level playing field, but in the meantime our biggest concern is probably our wireless customers that serve rural America. We believe our technologies are essential to farmers, schools, citizens, companies in rural parts of United States, and we hope we can maintain that service to serve those people.

  禁令在未来可能会有更大的潜在影响。但我们相信,美国最终将在网络空间采取各种措施以使我们更加安全。我们认为到那时,我们将得以在一个公平的环境中竞争。但与此同时,我们最担忧的可能是我们所服务的美国农村地区的无线客户。我们相信,我们的技术对美国农村地区的农民、学校、公民和公司至关重要, 并且希望能够继续为这些人服务。

(图via网络)

  但记者不服,又发起一轮“进攻”:

  Around the world there has been a lot a focus on flaws found in code, vulnerabilities in certain Huawei equipment in places like Italy and the U.K. Is it possible to secure Huawei devices and networks that run off of them? Or is that a pipe dream?

  在意大利和英国等地,华为某些设备的代码缺陷和漏洞一直是全球关注的焦点。是否有可能保护使用华为设备和网络的安全? 或者说那只是空想?

  不得不说,记者的提问更加“狡猾”了,但Purdy以诚恳的态度应对,不受其扰:

  It is impossible to eliminate all risk, whether 5G or whatever. It is impossible to eliminate all vulnerabilities in products.

  要消除所有风险是不可能的,不管是5G还是其他什么。消除产品中的所有漏洞是不可能的。

  One of the advantages we have is we are one of the most examined and evaluated companies in the world.

  但我们的一大优势是,我们是世界上接受审查和评估最多的公司之一。

  The flaws we have such as the U.K. oversight board revealed in our software engineering processes, those are things we can improve as a process, and that is what we think will make America safer and cyberspace safer.

  因此,我们任何的缺陷,比如英国监管委员会在我们的软件工程流程中指出的,这些方面我们都可以拿来改进,并作为持续改进流程的一部分,也是我们认为将使美国极其网络空间更加安全的东西。

  “但我们的优势之一是,我们是世界上接受审查和评估最多的公司之一。”可以说实力诠释了尼采的名言:What does not kill me, makes me stronger.(杀不死我的,只会让我变得更强大。)

  Purdy代表华为作出这样积极的表态,展示出的宽阔胸襟令人钦佩。

(图via网络)

  ROUND 3

  接着,提问的话筒交还给主持人:

  Are we in danger of having two separate 5G networks? One in China and one in the US?

  我们有没有可能面临这样的风险:拥有两个独立的5G网络,一个在中国,一个在美国?

  Purdy表示:

  I do not think so.

  我不这么认为。

  I think to help manage risk andpromote resiliency, which is fundamental, we have to make sure our networks are up and running and it will be more important when we have 5G.

  我认为,管理风险和提高网络弹性是最基本的,而为了达到这些目标,我们必须确保我们的网络已建立并正常运行。当部署5G网络时,这一点将更加重要。

  We are going to be dependent in a serious way on the digitized vertical industry sectors and government services. What the US and the private companies will do will have a diversity of suppliers. Hopefully we will be one of multiple suppliers. That helps promote resiliency and reduce risk.

  在政府服务领域,我们仍非常依赖垂直的数字化产业部门。美国和私营企业想要(并将会)拥有多样化的供应商。希望我们能成为众多供应商之一。这有助于增强网络弹性和降低风险。

(图via网络)

  你如何评价华为外籍高管Andy Purdy 和外媒这几回合的过招?又如何看待其观点?欢迎留言分享你的观点!

  文:YANMING

  资料、图:C-SPAN,网络

上一篇:比利时首都一火车站出现炸弹威胁 人员紧急撤离 下一篇:没有了

在线客服

  • 微信扫一扫